For someone who loves both but can't buy both, the competition is real. Further, The Washington Post's online subscription offers a wealth of professionally-made content - news, commentary, videos, and so on for a relatively reasonable price [especially when bought for a full year]. It could satisfy the bulk of one's daily content needs, if not all [which it certainly won't, but YouTube could start to fill that gap soon]. Similarly, The Washington Post's online subscription also competes with Netflix's, even though the comparison isn't quite obvious [it shows up for those who like/need/want both but can't afford both or don't want to spend on both].
No comments:
Post a Comment