Most Indians - especially Punjabis - are well aware of the existence of a large-sized subset of the Sikh population which is extreme and radical. The Emperor Kanishka terrorist act of 1985 was a direct result of this subset of the Sikh community, as have been numerous other large and small incidents (also see this, this, this, and this). Any regulation that relaxes security-checking for the turban opens up a potential security hole, especially since the turban is frequently large-enough to accommodate small-sized weapons or a small bomb (large enough to bring down an airliner).
And so, in my opinion, the turban - irrespective of which religion's individual wears it - must undergo stringent security checks at all airports worldwide. Strong and loud voices by Sikhs that touching the turban is an insult should not deter the airport security agencies from thoroughly searching it.
I, for one, want to feel 100% safe whenever I board an aircraft, no matter how much inconvenience it causes to me or others. We can certainly do without another Emperor Kanishka.
I, for one, want to feel 100% safe whenever I board an aircraft, no matter how much inconvenience it causes to me or others. We can certainly do without another Emperor Kanishka.
I can understand your feelings but the way it has been put is just too harsh.
ReplyDeleteTheir could have been a better way of posting the same.
@Anonymous
ReplyDeletePlease understand that I like brevity. While penning a post, my focus isn't on civility, but on the issue I write about. If you believe that my words are harsher than they should be, please exemplify and suggest how should have I written those instead.